Trial 12345 Report

Trial 12345 Report

Advanced NSCLC

Phase 1b/2 NSCLC 3 Arms Data as of 19 May 2026
1 / 7
15ENROLLED
25STUDY TARGET
60%VS TARGET
22SCREENED
7SCREEN FAILURES
6ACTIVE SITES

Cumulative Enrollment by Arm

Enrollment trajectory over time. Target completion: Q4 2026.

Site Recruitment Status

Enrollment counts vs. caps by site, with treatment arm assignment and current status.

Site ID Site Name Country Treatment Arm Screened Enrolled Screen Failures Site Cap Status
SITE-001 Site 0001-A United States Drug X 200 mg 7 5 2 5 Capped
SITE-002 Site 0002-B Germany Drug X 400 mg 6 4 2 5 Near Cap
SITE-003 Site 0003-C Japan Drug X 600 mg 31 2 29 4 Enrolling
SITE-005 Site 0005-E Brazil Drug X 400 mg 3 2 1 4 Enrolling
SITE-004 Site 0004-D Australia Drug X 200 mg 2 1 1 3 Enrolling
SITE-006 Site 0006-F South Africa Drug X 600 mg 1 1 0 4 Enrolling

Global Site Map

Geographic distribution of investigational sites. Bubble color indicates enrollment status: ● Enrolling · ● Near Cap · ● Capped

Patient Demographics

Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients across all treatment arms.

Treatment Arm N Median Age Male (%) ECOG 0 (%) ECOG 1 (%) PD-L1 ≥50% (%)
Drug X 200 mg 6 51.0 50% 0% 83% 67%
Drug X 400 mg 6 57.5 50% 50% 50% 50%
Drug X 600 mg 3 60.0 33% 33% 67% 67%

Age Distribution

All enrolled patients.

Sex by Treatment Arm

Balance across arms (percentage).

Histology

Primary tumor histology classification.

Treatment-Related Adverse Events

Top 5 treatment-related adverse events (all dose cohorts), ranked by event count. Each bar is stacked by Drug X dose cohort (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg).

AE Severity Heatmap

Event count by CTCAE grade (1–4) for top 10 preferred terms. Higher intensity = more events.

Adverse Event Summary Table

Treatment-related events (Related + Possibly Related) occurring in ≥2 patients, by arm.

Adverse Event
Treatment-Related Events (n)
Drug X 200 mg Drug X 400 mg Drug X 600 mg
Fatigue 3 4 0
Elevated ALT 0 1 3
Diarrhea 1 1 1
Elevated AST 0 0 3
Anemia 1 0 0
Arthralgia 0 1 0
Hyperbilirubinemia 1 0 0
Nausea 0 1 0
Rash 1 0 0
35TOTAL AE EVENTS
22TREATMENT-RELATED
10CTCAE GRADE ≥3
7SERIOUS (SAE)

Hepatotoxicity Monitoring (eDISH)

Evaluation of Drug-Induced Serious Hepatotoxicity (eDISH) plot. Peak post-baseline ALT (×ULN) vs peak total bilirubin (×ULN). Dashed lines: ALT 3×ULN and bilirubin 2×ULN cutpoints.

2ALT ≥ CUTPOINT
1IN HY’S LAW ZONE
3×ULNALT CUT
2×ULNTB CUT

eDISH Plot

Each point is one enrolled patient (peak values). Upper-right quadrant = possible Hy's Law range (ALT ≥3×ULN and bilirubin ≥2×ULN).

eDISH Quadrant Summary

Distribution of enrolled patients (n = 15) across eDISH quadrants.

Quadrant # Patients % of Enrolled
Normal Range 12 80.0
Hyperbilirubinemia 1 6.7
Temple's Corollary 1 6.7
Possible Hy's Law Range 1 6.7

DILI Watchlist

Patients with peak ALT >2×ULN or TBili >1.5×ULN. Sorted by peak ALT. HER-0008 (400 mg) meets possible Hy's Law criteria; HER-0015 (600 mg) shows isolated ALT elevation.

Patient Arm Site Peak ALT (×ULN) Peak TBili (×ULN) arm_short quadrant Peak AST (×ULN) Hy's Law
HER-0015 Drug X 600 mg SITE-006 7.0 1.0 600 mg Temple's Corollary 7.6 No
HER-0008 Drug X 400 mg SITE-002 4.3 2.4 400 mg Possible Hy's Law Range 4.5 ⚠️ Yes
HER-0010 Drug X 600 mg SITE-003 2.8 1.6 600 mg Normal Range 3.0 No
HER-0004 Drug X 200 mg SITE-001 1.0 3.0 200 mg Hyperbilirubinemia 1.1 No

Preliminary Efficacy Signals

Investigator-assessed best overall response per RECIST v1.1. Early data — not powered for formal comparison.

17%ORR 200 MG
33%ORR 400 MG
33%ORR 600 MG
80%DCR (ALL)

Waterfall Plot

Best percentage change in sum of target lesion diameters from baseline (RECIST v1.1). One bar per evaluable patient; dashed lines = PR (−30%) and PD (+20%).

Response Summary by Arm

Investigator-assessed BOR (RECIST v1.1). ORR = CR + PR; DCR = CR + PR + SD.

Treatment Arm N
Best Overall Response (n)
Rates
CR PR SD PD NE ORR (%) DCR (%)
Drug X 200 mg 6 0 1 4 1 0 16.7 83.3
Drug X 400 mg 6 1 1 3 1 0 33.3 83.3
Drug X 600 mg 3 0 1 1 1 0 33.3 66.7

Exploratory Biomarker: TGZ123-A

Continuous central-lab biomarker assay Biomarker TGZ123-A. Exploratory cutoff 42 dichotomizes patients into TGZ123-A Low vs TGZ123-A High for early signal checks.

12 / 15PATIENTS WITH BIOMARKER
80%ASSESSMENT RATE
1TGZ123-A HIGH (≥42)
11TGZ123-A LOW (<42)

Outcomes by TGZ123-A Group

Among biomarker-evaluable patients only. TGZ123-A Low (<42) vs TGZ123-A High (≥42) — early descriptive signals, not inferential.

Objective response (ORR)

Any treatment-related AE

Disease control (DCR)

About This Run

Execution timing and LLM token utilization for this render. Insights are generated fresh on every run via gpt-4.1 (Bayer internal API).

Generated: 2026-06-15 08:18:57 EDT

273.3sTOTAL RENDER
273.2sINTERPRETATION
0.0sHTML KNIT
$0.0000LLM COST (EST.)
91,720 / 3,337TOKENS IN / OUT
15 / 15ARTIFACTS INTERPRETED
Artifact Total (s) Snapshot (s) LLM (s) Tokens in Tokens out
chart-enrollment 16.8 6.2 10.6 6,124 218
gt-sites 18.8 0.9 17.9 NA NA
gt-demog 11.7 0.9 10.9 NA NA
chart-age 17.2 2.4 14.8 NA NA
chart-sex 11.9 2.3 9.6 NA NA
chart-histology 15.7 2.4 13.3 NA NA
chart-ae 14.5 2.3 12.3 NA NA
chart-ae-grade 15.9 2.3 13.7 NA NA
gt-ae 10.4 0.9 9.5 NA NA
chart-edish 12.6 2.3 10.3 NA NA
gt-edish 10.8 0.9 10.0 NA NA
gt-dili 13.5 0.9 12.6 NA NA
chart-waterfall 18.8 2.4 16.4 NA NA
gt-response 15.8 1.0 14.8 NA NA
biomarker-outcomes 67.7 3.6 64.1 NA NA